As the deadline approaches for public sector construction projects to reach BIM Level 2 compliance, Terry Mundy, of Lloyd’s Register asks if the construction sector is ready.
The UK Government’s deadline for the construction sector to prequalify for participation in public sector construction programmes, by being ‘BIM Ready’ by April 2016, is nearly upon us.
But what does ‘BIM Ready’ mean and how can the construction sector demonstrate that they are ready?
It could be argued that a tier 1 contractor could demonstrate ‘BIM Readiness’ through effective BIM to Build to FM processes that are adhered to throughout his supply chain, which meets the client needs and are compliant with relevant standards.
But to whom can the BIM Provider demonstrate that level of compliance?
Independent Third Party validation of BIM Readiness through accreditation to Level 2 Business Systems, is currently the most credible means of providing assurance to both UK Government and the private sector.
Lloyd’s Register (LR) will ‘dip check’ your BIM processes, procedures and competencies by way of a one day gap analysis, at your offices, to bench mark where you are relative to the LR BIM Level 2 Scheme requirements. This gap analysis can be a ‘one off’ process or it can be an iterative process to provide ongoing direction towards BIM Level 2 accreditation.
At the core of level 2 accreditation is compliance with PAS 1192 but to evaluate an organisation exclusively against the PAS 1192 series, represents a rather narrow scope and does not provide for the added value that organisations, looking beyond the ‘badge,’ require. In recognition of the added value expectation, LR have introduced into the scope of assessment, a risk based approach supporting business best practice . This more rounded and comprehensive BIM assessment process, is particularly relevant for the supply chain scopes of certification and provide assurance to the tier 1 Project Providers of the competence, interoperability of software platforms as well as process compliance of the supply chain.
The LR BIM Level 2 Accreditation Scheme was developed with the intent of achieving a balance between rigour of assessment and pragmatism. We require no documentation to be provided in advance of the assessment, as we have found both the collation of data by the client and the desk top review , by the assessor, to be too time consuming for both parties and not cost effective.
The initial stage of the assessment is the Gap Analysis. During this phase one to one interviews with key staff, with responsibilities across the full spectrum of the required BIM scope of accreditation, will be undertaken. We have found this to be the most effective and efficient means of understanding the BIM processes adopted by the provider under assessment.
The benefit of this approach is that it provides the freedom of the auditee to explain their BIM management processes without concerning themselves with how the described system meets PAS 1192, it is the responsibility of the auditor to map across the described processes to the applicable standards.
The objective of the Gap Analysis, which normally comprises one to a maximum of two days, is to identify at a high level, any major gaps against the applicable standards and scheme principles and report any such gaps /identified weaknesses.
The Gap Analysis concludes with a report which initially takes the form of verbal feedback and whilst the ensuing discussion may gravitate around issues requiring improvement, the principal focus will be on how the organisation can introduce changes which will take them closer to a level 2 compliant system.
The Gap Analysis feedback is followed by a detailed report of the findings and the agreed measures to address the identified gaps.
When the Provider under assessment is satisfied that he has closed the reported gaps/weaknesses in his BIM system, the next stage is the implementation assessment.
The implementation assessment will initially focus on the findings of the Gap Analysis and the associated closure of such identified gaps but will additionally seek evidence that the BIM Management system fully conforms to scheme requirements and this assessment is undertaken against a live BIM project. In the event that a live BIM project is not available to be assessed then, subject to confirmation of a compliant system, Partial Accreditation would be awarded, with Full Accreditation being awarded once effective implementation of the assessed systems could be verified against the live BIM project.
An important area to be examined at this stage is the relationship of the BIM Provider with his supply chain. This is to ensure that the cultural shift from the traditional contractual adversarial relationship to one of collaboration has been achieved.
Provided that, upon the conclusion of the implementation assessment against a live project, no major deficiencies are outstanding and that an action plan has been established to address any outstanding minor deficiencies, then BIM Level 2 Business Systems Accreditation can be awarded.
The validity of the awarded accreditation spans a three year term during which a surveillance programme will be undertaken.
The surveillance programme serves to not only verify the maintenance of the standards, competencies and processes, against which accreditation was originally awarded, but also to verify management commitment to continuous improvement as measured against adherence to the action plan to close out the minor deficiencies, agreed prior to award.
Failure to demonstrate such ongoing commitment may result in accreditation suspension or withdrawal, a preparedness to withdraw accreditation being a measure of the effectiveness of the scheme.
Lloyd’s Register BIM Level 2 Business Systems Accreditation represents independent confirmation of BIM Management systems conformity to recognised good practice leading to best practice through defined continuous improvement milestones, set over the three year accreditation term. A confirmation delivered by a brand with global recognition.
Terry Mundy
Lloyd’s Register
