Malcolm Iredale of Carrock Design & Build has been found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct (UPC) for failing to enter into an adequate written agreement
Malcolm Iredale was contracted by his client to prepare new drawing plans for the conversion of a derelict barn into living accommodation.
Allegations
Malcolm Iredale faced allegations that he failed to provide adequate terms of engagement to his client before carrying out work, and that he failed to adequately consult his client on the integration of the flat roof prior to the submission of a planning application.
The PCC heard evidence regarding Iredale’s letter of appointment, which had been drafted with the assistance of a solicitor over 16 years ago.
Iredale accepted that this appointment letter did not adequately cover the terms of engagement as outlined in Standard 4.4 of the Architects Code and admitted that the failure amounted to UPC.
Outcome
The PCC found the facts proved in relation to both allegations.
It found that his failure to enter into an adequate written agreement was in contravention with Standard 4.4 of the Architects Code and amounted to UPC.
The PCC found that Iredale was not guilty of UPC in relation to the allegation regarding the flat roof.
The PCC accepted that the architect’s lack of consultation with his clients arose because he genuinely believed that, in the context of the application as a whole, this aspect of the design was not significant.
The PCC noted Iredale’s explanation as to why, in his professional opinion, it was the best design solution for his clients.
In considering the sanction, the PCC acknowledged that Iredale has no adverse regulatory history, he engaged with the regulatory process, expressed genuine remorse, and has taken steps to remediate his failings.
The ARB concluded a reprimand to be the appropriate sanction.
